Whether the disposition in Brown v. Kemmerer, U.S.D.C. Del. Civ. No. 13-cv-0138, qualifies as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

No question identified. : | Whether the dlepoeton + Keown V. ROMEEAL.C Del, Civ. No. \3-¢cVOIS38, Quslities AS STKE fax papas oF ASCE. $115. & Saal Nis Cull dectde onv“the Watt ak Cait ORR THAT the FEtthouea, Qualifes Ge Ty FoRtn\ Wuperis, Whetner this decision will be the \aw av Ao lads , 3. Can & Pa tn) CONCERN ® CiVA\ \wosut RceRuE MEK) toe Gooe ta-Gan 3 Salas opal } ) Kang Pauper a ae Clay Wiis K CASE CONS MERE Akh of Nutt CONCERN, IWUSC. S ANS @) 3 5. \Nes be Chef Vode Satins opinion patie ANd OWASEd is ORSON § 0 ‘Tide of Conteits fee CQuedlins Resell Lia a tes. ee A Related Cases ee ee 8 1 ABM (Reet, exbene) “Woe & Aulihoties 6 Sy Siiles a Roles © SS