No. 19-7223
Erik Bilal Khan v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: arraignment counsel-duty criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance lesser-crimes plea-bargaining prejudice prejudice-standard reasonable-probability right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether counsel was ineffective in misadvising and interfering with the defendant's choice of plea at the arraignment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : ie
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2020)
2019-11-06
Application (19A493) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 3, 2020.
2019-10-26
Application (19A493) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 4, 2019 to January 3, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent