No. 19-7224

Cheryl Jones v. Stephen Goldberg, et al.

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2020-01-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: borrower-rights civil-procedure civil-rights document-falsification due-process foreclosure fraud legal-rights lender-fraud lender-practices property-law standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When a lender presents false documents and wins a final judgement, does this violate the rights of the borrower?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : 1, WHEN A LENDER PRESENTSFALSE DOCUMENTSAND WINSA FINAL JUDGEMENT, DOES THIS VIOLATE THE RIGHTS OF THE BORROWER? . : ) 2. WHEN THE BORROWERIS NOT GIVEN THE RIGHT TO A DISCOVERY TIME TO REVIEW AND PRESENT EVIDENCE OF THUS THE COURT SUPPORTING __ BUSINESSES IN ILLEGAL PRACTICE? 3. DOES THE LENDERHAVE THE LEGALRIGHTTOFILE . _ FORCLOSURE PROCEEDDINGS WITH AN EXPIRED LEIN DOCUMENT? 4, IS THE LENDER OBLIGATED BY LAW TO NOTIFY THE BORROWER/OCCUPANTS OF THE PROPERTY BEING FORECLOSED?

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2019-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2020)

Attorneys

Cheryl Jones
Cheryl Jones — Petitioner
Cheryl Jones — Petitioner