No. 19-7232

Francisco Argenis Parra v. Joe A. Lizarraga, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: accomplice-statements-corroboration alibi-instruction bruton-v-united-states co-defendant-statements confrontation-clause due-process ineffective-assistance jury-instructions lesser-included-offenses self-defense sixth-amendment supplemental-credibility-instruction
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-03-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did Trial Counsel Render Ineffective Assistance

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Did Trial Counsel Render Ineffective Assistance by Failing to Request an Adequate Supplemental Credibility Instruction? II. Did Trial Counsel Render Ineffective Assistance by Failing to Request an Alibi Instruction? III. Did the Trial Court Violate Parra’s Right to Confrontation [Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968)] by Admitting Co-defendant Arciga’s Extrajudicial Statements? IV. Did the Trial Court Prejudicially Fail to Instruct the Jury That the Codefendants and the Drug Sellers’ Extrajudicial Accomplice Statements Required Corroboration? V. Did the Trial Court Prejudicially Fail to Instruct the Jury on the Lesser Included Offenses of Second Degree Murder and Manslaughter? VI. Did the Trial Court Deprive Parra of Due Process and a Fair Trial by Failing to Instruct the Jury on SelfDefense? VII. Did the Trial Court Err by Failing to Provide Proper and Complete Jury Instructions on the Special Circumstance Allegations? VIII. Did the Combined Effect of the Errors Deprive Parra of His Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial? IX. Is an Evidentiary Hearing Warranted? 1 TOPICAL INDEX Page QUESTIONS PRESENTED .-2-0-1 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS INVOLVED . 2

Docket Entries

2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-01-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2020)

Attorneys

Francisco Parra
Rose Fay ArfaFay Arfa, A Law Corporation, Petitioner
Rose Fay ArfaFay Arfa, A Law Corporation, Petitioner