No. 19-7237

Christopher L. Croom v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2020-01-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: admonishment conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defendant judicial-admonishment jury-bias right-to-counsel trial-court trial-court-admonishment waiver
Key Terms:
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a defendant knowingly waive the right to conflict-free counsel when the trial court merely admonishes the defendant that a conflict exists, without telling the defendant how the conflict could impact the defense?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : a oe _ QUESTION S)PRESENTED TT serene | Dees a detendent Kovlingly Waive the MiZht to Conflict free po Counsel When the tial Court: merely admonishes the defendant that a Contijes : oo CX Sts, Without telling the defendant hou! the Conflict Could impact defense to __ Does it matter thet the admonishmeat® administered to the “ defendaat were Produted Ond oklivered. to the Jude by a7 adverse Pap ty ; : involved i the Conflict of nterest SiPvafpion® ; . : : _U : LS it Peorer fora Trial Tulse 40.disregard areqwest to to fa an inqiry. of a PRESS ly. biaSea Jbrar Wha Was not Porth comiagiy hanest ; ducing Voie Dire When. rt 1$ brousht tO the Courts attention dering delibe La tions? . — Does it matter /f this rewest for an inpiry Of the Jvrar Came from the State or the: Detease when the Constitutions} Rights Of the clefend, 4 i , are at Stake Cither Way . : . ; SO, se ‘

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-28
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2019-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2020)

Attorneys

Christopher L. Croom Croom
Christopher L. Croom — Petitioner
Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent