Whether the trial court violated the defendant's constitutional rights by abusing its discretion in rendering a decision contrary to law, resulting in a miscarriage of justice

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ii bi Whether the tyial Court violsted the defendants protected constitutional s riguts by abusing its discretion where in pareing out Appellant's arguement it i 5 y g i Lk Ss Do rendered 6 decision which is contrery to law, essentially wes effectively a aa miscarriage of justice. i Befendent-Appellant answer: YES oS Pleiatiff~Appellee would answer: NO po “Trisl Court would enswer:No : : of Whether the trial court by miscaleuletiog the totel semount sent to tbe : . 1 . { detendant, where as only 90% of $1,003, not 90% of $1313.99 should have been : tske: for reimbursement, based on the judges Gecision, the defendant should be : rvetutned the amount of £278.00. . : answer; YES : : Whether the trial court erred by not applying the Michigan administrative rule : 794.6539, which states thet a prisoner can sccumulate funds without limits", : woerees the evidence shows that the funds in question was accumulated over a 8 : year seriod? . = “ Detendant-Appellant snewer: ¥ES : i Wether the trial court erred by cousideriog the funds ia question “Assets” ; wbhecass as the evidence shows that thess tunds were a loan ead py law, loens . . \ . { avn .oasidered debt net assets. . ; vr ae H | . woe J . : ; ; t