No. 19-7251

William McNeal v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2020-01-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: Apprendi apprendi-standard apprendi-v-new-jersey criminal-law criminal-procedure degree-classification due-process essential-element essential-elements jury-trial reclassification sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Florida's interpretation of 'essential element' is contrary to Apprendi v. New Jersey

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED ; Whether, when determining if a defendant’s offense can be reclassified to the next highest degree, Florida’s interpretation of “essential element” as being only those elements contained in the definition of the crime itself is contrary to this Court's decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)? ; .

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-12-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2020)

Attorneys

Florida
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent
William McNeal
William McNeal — Petitioner
William McNeal — Petitioner