No. 19-7258
Jamal Marquise Collins v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure holguin-hernandez judicial-review legal-standard objections remand sentencing timeliness timely-objection
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether parties to a criminal proceeding must make timely objections to the unreasonableness of a sentence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether parties to a criminal proceeding must make timely objections to the unreasonableness of a sentence? Subsidiary question: whether the case should be held pending HolguinHernandez, _U.S.__, 139 S.C.t 2666 (June 3, 2019), and potentially remanded in light of that forthcoming authority? ii
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2020)
Attorneys
Jamal Marquise Collins
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent