Joseph Totoro, II v. United States
DueProcess
Did the Court, the United States Attorney, and the former attorneys violate DOJ policy and Due Process
QUESTIONS PRESENTED , : 1. Did the Court, the United States Attorney, and the former attorneys violate . DOJ policy and.Due Process by allowing him to give up all his rights, except for those of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel as pert ains to the Plea only, which violates Rule 11(b)? 2. Did the United States Attorney, the Court, and his former attorney during the Plea Colloquy.delete and ignore the scienter requirement-of knowingly in the 3rd count of the indictment 18 U.S.C. § 2252, which would make the entire Plea not knowingly, voluntary, and intelligent? , 3. Did the Court, the United ‘States. Attorney, and. his former counsel, . misrepresent in the January 21, 2016 Plea Offer made available to him pr ior : to the competency evaluation which was no longer available due to the misleading statement that the main witness was now cooperating, which ; violated his Due Process by allowing him while incompetent to give up his . ; Speedy Trial rights? ; 4. Did the United States Appeals Court for the Third Circuit, the Department of Justice, the Bureau of Prisons, and Fort Dix FCI violate Appellant's Sixth. : Amendment right to access to the Courts by deliberately not delivering legal mail and not allowing him to file for rehearing En Banc because Appellant . Was never served the denial of the motion in reply to not uphold the Plea ‘Waiver? ; . : ;