No. 19-7267

Piper Lakay Ellis Snowton v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-diligence due-process equitable-doctrine fraud fraudulent-concealment judicial-bias procedural-technicalities standing veterans-affairs
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-03-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-the-facts-and-circumstances-surrounding-case-no-3:18-cv-2900-s-bn-and-case-no-19-10547-indicate-bias-and-favoritism

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. whether With the facts and circumstances surrounding case No. 3:18-cv-2900-S-BN from the united states district court, northern district of texas, dallas division and case no.19-10547 from the fifth circuit, regarding a file and reference number 1025063, indicating and Implicating Veterans Affairs involvement, doing business as the United States of America, where evidence was presented that was more than mere scintilla, in light of the fact that as Judges being employed by the Respondent that Bias and favortism didn't play a roll in their recommendations, opinions, orders, judgements,. and Dismissals. 2.Whether or Not any Evicence Presented was going to be sufficient Enough even when there was Substabtial evidence for the courts to see the Truth and can see that there are Civil and Criminals activities involved 3.Whether the Equitable Doctrine was deliberately Ignored and Overlooked,,Knowing that the Plaintiff, Appellant, Petitioner , despite use of due dilligence,could not, did not discover the incidents until after statute of limitations period. 4nhether in weight of the Facts and Circumstances that Prompted the Pro-se filing in the First Place, evidence exists, of the Fraudulent Concealment of the claims and of other type of NonDiscovery of her rights .that is causing issues with diagnosis, contributing to the withholding of medical information, that would confirm the diagnosis., and consideration of the Petitioner Not being an attorney and missing deadlines to file is just a mere technicality, that shouldn't have been used to deny the motion to Reopen ,extend the Time to Appeal. 5. whether the Errors in the findings, conclusion and recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge should have been considered, The Petitioner was not a veteran. 6. Whether The Supreme Court will acknowledge that this is Exceptional, Extraordinary circumstances that warrants the exercise of its Power 2nd that no adequate relief can be obtained in any other form or from any other court.

Docket Entries

2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-02-13
Waiver of right of respondents United States to respond filed.
2020-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 13, 2020)

Attorneys

Piper Lakay Ellis Snowton
Piper Lakay Ellis Snowton — Petitioner
Piper Lakay Ellis Snowton — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent