No. 19-7271
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attempted-burglary burglary burglary-statute burglary-statutes categorical-approach conviction conviction-requirements criminal-plea entry entry-element firearm-possession generic-crime generic-crimes instrument plea-withdrawal rehaif-v-united-states sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Tennessee's burglary statutes are generic
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether Tennessee’s burglary statutes are generic where the State can obtain a conviction by proving only attempted burglary because the element of “entry” is satisfied by a mere showing of the use of an instrument in an attempt to make entry. 2. Whether the judgment below should be vacated and the case remanded for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), where what is now an essential element of the § 922(g) crime was not pled and Mr. Hall made an unknowing and therefore, involuntary plea. ii
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Eric Hall
Doris Randle-Holt — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Doris Randle-Holt — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent