Under Habeas Corpus, can this Court take NOTICE of a previous UNconstitutional ERROR having a Substantial INjurious EFFECT

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The case at hand is a business dispute > transformed inte a criminal case; ALL quto repair shops ace —> MANDATED too COMPLY with _ Californias auto repair ~LAWS f The auto fepaic shop in thi§ case 9FALLED) Too COMPLY with Californias auto repair LAWS S Wow can petitioner be charged oc Convicted for ROBBERY, when -—~, the MANDATED auto cepait LAWS. 9884.16 and 98B4.9;CONFLZECTS and TNVALIDATES the ELEMENTS of ROBBERY; Specifically forces, the auto repair Shop foo FORFELT Their POSSESSTON and PROPERT-Y INTERESTS for parts, labor and authorization Contra ct? , L_4 \low come petitioner has been > Convicted with the USE of DECELVING and TAINTED testimony ® 5) ow come the MANDATED auto repair JAWS were NOT APPLLED at petitioner's Trial ? ) . QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : Under Habeas Corpus, can this — Court take NOTLCE of a previous UNconstitutional ERROR fray ng Q , Substantial IN\uCious EFFECTand ktoH SP Under Habeas Corpus, when el pro. per. orisoner_ with DILIGENCE and CAUSE has DISCOVERED NEW EVIDENCE; and has COMPLIED with ALL —= State/ Federal LAWS and RULES governing — filings For NEW EN/L. dence; why 15 petitioner being bENTEN habeas COs review ? Qs GOT to SEE this ° PM ST bmp Ln the State of California, can auto repair Shops operate an SLLEGAL BUSINESS; +hat LURES customers in for Services, and a business DISPUTE ENSUES because of servicesscanan auto repair Shop usé CRIMINAL THREATS and DISPLAY FIREARMS too ENFORCE an DLLEGAL BENEFIT of LTEN? "