No. 19-7287
Joey Banks v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-03-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Banks was denied his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) Whether Banks was denied his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel. (2) Whether Banks’s trial was adversely affected in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. ii
Docket Entries
2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-02-13
Waiver of right of respondent Vannoy, Warden to respond filed.
2020-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Joey Banks
Joey Banks — Petitioner
Vannoy, Warden
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent