Whether civil commitment proceedings are sufficiently similar to deportation proceedings such that the distinction between collateral and direct consequences is inapplicable when defining the scope of reasonable professional assistance or determining whether counsel's advice pertaining to civil commitment is within the range of competence demanded of attorneys

QUESTIONS. PRESENTED oe | 1) IN THIS CASE OF _FinST TMPRESSION) TASK THIS COURT Th FINALLY Necibe. (oHeTHeA THE NATURE OF Civil CoMIVINTMeNT, IT3 PROCEDURAL SUTULARITY TO DEPORTATION PRoceeDinas, THE Sevefe PENALTIES | ASSOCIATED TRPREWITH_ AND iT3_INTIMATE RELATION “TD CRIMINAL ISTICE PROCEEDINGS RENDEAS THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN CALATERAL | AND DIRECT CONSEQUENCES INAPPLICABLE CUHEN DéFINING THE ___| scope OF REASONABLE PROFESSIOMAL ASSISTAMCA OR DETERMMUALE uierteR Couneels Abvice RERTAUWING THERE LS lorrin THe | eae DE Comperenice LEMANDED Dé DENS ATIONEYE? 2)IN ViRsINIA,AS MOST STATES, CIVIL COMMITMENT HAS Become AN __llinte@RAL Component” AE CRIMINAL PRoceeDiNes WHEN A DEFENDANT his CHARGED WITH CERTAIN DEFENSES AND NUMEROUS NEGATIVE ___ Consequences Flow AuromaricauLy Faom A_COUVICTION THEREOF Eby PERMANENTLY CATEGORIZED AS A_ SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR, louprmussion. iT THE SEXUALLY ViovenLT PREDATOR DATABASE AND EVAUIATION __| py THe cut Review Commitee foe Cuil CommirTmenTy THeReroee | SHOULDNT A_DEFENDANT BE APPRISED OF THIS CRITICAL |SSUE __|[erore His DeciSiow To PLEAD GuilTY Cau Be Conlsidekeo AVOUNTARY. | PWING AMD INTELUBENT ACT? | | | | |