No. 19-7306

Dmitry Pronin v. Charles Wright, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 4th-circuit appellate-review civil-rights credibility district-court due-process legal-construction procedural-interpretation standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court properly construed the legal argument for a party in a civil rights lawsuit, and whether the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals improperly allowed the district court to discount credibility on summary judgment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED = _ ; GG) Moxy on United States District gudee ~ construe legal argument for a port ina ~ — civif rights lawsuit, an argument tet tne porry oe sel river rise? a amp; He Honry M, Herfony construe such = ee Pid, pt Chovbs Wig Wal lichen oe Blockwold. 7 lon / | oo ; ~~ @)Can ci tiak evid ; _ vo ln path boring summa, Furbo! Is6a Of — @) Did the U.S Court Appools for +he 4-th oe DP inperis ly alow ae Poin Gust Nw | ; Po ess Credibility ON @ sumemory jiragemem am oe

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-14
Brief of respondent Charles Wright, Neal Urch and L. Blackwell in opposition filed.
2020-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2020)

Attorneys

Charles Wright, Neal Urch and L. Blackwell
Anne Ross CulbreathWillson Jones Carter and Baxley, Respondent
Anne Ross CulbreathWillson Jones Carter and Baxley, Respondent
Dmitry Pronin
Dmitry Pronin — Petitioner
Dmitry Pronin — Petitioner