I. Does the Sixth Circuit's failure to analyze the claim in consideration of the overwhelming corroborating innocence proof in Mr. Bough's case, in conjunction with what Mr. Shears' testimony would have had on a reasonable juror in Bough's case, as opposed to relying upon the biased self preservation evidence Shears presented in his own case, contravene Precedent?

II. Does the Sixth Circuit's failure to address gateway timeliness based upon the immediacy within which Mr. Bough filed his challenges upon receipt of the new evidence, as opposed to how long it took for his Co-defendant to provide such information, contravene this Court's precedent?

III. Does the Sixth Circuit's finding of an insufficient showing of actual innocence, by essentially requiring Mr. Bough to prove conclusive exoneration, contravene this Court's precedent?

Does the Sixth Circuit's failure to analyze the claim in consideration of the overwhelming corroborating innocence proof in Mr. Bough's case, in conjunction with what Mr. Shears' testimony would have had on a reasonable juror in Bough's case, as opposed to relying upon the biased self preservation evidence Shears presented in his own case, contravene precedent?