How can the Supreme Court of the United States uphold constitutional laws if the court allows state territories to plunder the cornerstones of those laws with roguish motives, who allow prosecutors to manipulate facts until they are historically inaccurate?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED TO THE COURT 1 1. HOW CAN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 5 UPHOLD CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS IF THE COURT ALLOWS STATE TERRITORIES TO PLUNDER THE CORNERSTONES 3 OF THOSE LAWS WITH ROGUISH MOTIVES, WHO ALLOW PROSECUTORS TO MANIPULATE FACTS UNTIL THEY ARE 4 HISTORICALLY INNACURATE. 5 2. IS IT THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURTS INTENTION 6 AND IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE UNITED STATES TO ALLOW PROSECUTORS TO MANIPULATE/ MANUFACTURE ; EVIDENCE UNTIL THEY ARE HISTORICALLY INNACURATE _ IN ORDER TO COERSE VERDICTS THAT ARE UNRELIABLE WHEN kg THE TOTATLITY OF ALL OTHER EVIDENCE RELATED TO THE CASE WHICH ARE INCULPATING,IS LESS THAN CIRCUMSTANCIAL 9 10 3. TF THE STATE PROSECUTORS ENTIRE CASE CENTERED ON 1" AN INTERROGATION RECORDING THAT WAS ILLEGALLY HELD, WOULDN'T THE PROSECUTOR' ALTERING REAL TIME RESPONSES 2 INTO HISTORICALLY INNACURATE ANSWERS VIOLATE DUE PROCESS CLAUSES WHICH ARE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL 43 _ LAW UNDER THE XIV AMENDMENT UNITED STATE CONSTITUTION 3 NAPUE V ILLIONOIS 360 U.S. 264 14 15 4. IS IT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES TO ig | ALLOW TRIAL COUNSEL 10 ESCAPE FIDUCIARY DUTIES TO FULLY INVESTIGATE MATERIAL EVIDENCES WHICH ARE TANGIBLE AUDIO . 7 RECORDINGS AS WELL AS SCIENTIFIC DNA EVIDENCES BEFORE | THEY MAKE CRITICAL STRATEGIC DECISIONS WHICH FORFIET 18 DEFENDANTS RIGHTS TO PLACE PROSECUTORS CASES TO EFFECTIVE AND MEANINGFUL ADVERSARIAL CHALLENGES 49 UNITED STATES V CRONIC 466 U, S 648 20 . 7 21 29 23 24 5 : ; 25 ; . 26 27 28 , a.