Whether the district court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, despite the plaintiff's claims that there were genuine issues of material facts as to the 'quantity' of force used and the 'circumstances' under which the force was used

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , 4 :) 3 Dre arstrct cout ene fe Uh ce errr by Freaking SOMME Javgment Her Asesp ruiing thee He cecore LeyWE fe court ceHects they Fectrt cleims dv9}shenb 4o crecte JENvine 155ves OF MASI Teets Bs fo the "Quentty" 9 Fece See hy Fhe CPE CES, BS WEI 2S the“ circu Stences” une Which tho Jetce We vee. "see" evhihs} A. Boing thet {re recut exec the coud never “ chonged’ with ce. | Sect 40 these 7 issues, These 2 Fenvin€ is5vEs oF metoriat Hops SHH ewist He a {ower coord MULE "Clewe" excoe? 7 ol) )d He UStect court one YAh cir exeor D4 Gren Eng Somm wey | Joggment d2fed OF OF 2 DV) soo pref is of Boch o7 He Ccera wm HS Cl $1983 czse? 3) Ya the Sistece court end Hh FOF oY Grok somrerd Josgnent pidhod ever ever! oF zwEssing the ewe we Guaisty oF He sadrosion ore MY 4th wmend ment rv ghys? ’ . 4) pid fe stot cout ane Wh oie excor bY nF ever eVrewwing : fre guermmornts intecs} in the neers V5e KEE, ere wes. z excor mage Wher phe court incocrecd CPC? thop is WES PY yorsion oF events Prat Z Wes HeSer become z ce ccher For my brow Rocte?? RECEIVED JAN 16 2020 ; QPFICE OF THE CLERK