No. 19-7321

Piper Lakay Ellis Snowton v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights due-process government-misconduct governmental-misconduct informed-consent mandamus mandamus-action medical-experimentation medical-information-withholding standing
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Supreme Court will review the evidence in this case and recognize and acknowledge that the respondent, the United States of America, doing business as Department of Health and Human Services, is in authority and leadership over the control of laws and regulations in enforcing the compliances

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1Whether The United States Supreme Court, Will review The Evidence In this Case and recognize and Acknowlege That The Respondent, The United States Of America,doing busineess as Department Of Health and Human Services; ALEX M. AZAR Il,Secretary,U.S. Department of Health And Human Services, as being in Authority and Leadership Over the Contro! of Laws and Regulations in enforcing the compliances . Inthe Performances of these Health Departments And Laboratories as well as for the unauthorized Hospitals non-regulatory and non-compliance in human Experimentation without a Patient informed Consent, among Other existing performances such as the deliberate withholding of an investigation into the Misconduct of these Public Entities and Others under the control of the U-S.HHS.with its Departments in charge of these Unlawful Improper Governmental Activities. (2). Whether The United States Supreme Court will Consider the 19/15, letter to the Petitioner, from the United States DOJ, Disability Rights Section.civil rights Division, In reference to [CTS# 501104, regarding the Georgia Department Of Human Resources, Et.AL,Atlanta, Georgia, received by DOJ on September 30,2014.,.and the CMS, Letter to me from Director Karen Dyer,of the Division of Clinical Laboratory Improvement and Quality., and from the HHSC PRR 2/3 Civil Rights Office , Dr. James Zoretic, Regional Medical Director, DSHS-Public Health Region 2/3., and from Texas HHSC OIG Deputy Quinton Amold, who all review this Evidence and states That this is more appropriately addressed by the U.S.HHS, who have constantly ignored each and every Complaints made by the Pstitioner in regards to these incidents and misconducts of improper acts and the withholding of Medical Information, inorder to Protect and help cover up wrong doings by joining in with those that are under. U.S.HHS, and Its OCR even states in a E-Mail that there is no HIV/AIDS OFFICE WITHIN HHS that would investigate my allegations (3).Whether The U.S. Supreme court will recognize, acknowledge and consider after review of all Documents that the Plaintiff, Appellant, Petitioner Complainst and court filing and requested Mandamus are not (FRIVOLOUS), and that the Facts in this case are not baseless and the Evidence Prove it. (4). Whether, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas and whether TT and Whether the United States Courts of Appeals For the Fifth Circuit and Bias toward the Plaintiff, Appellant ° ‘In their Judgements in dismissing the Evidence Put before the Courts because of the Defendants and . Appellees are the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the courts magistrates, Judges are employees of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (5).Whether, the Petitioner will get any fair Judgement based on the United States court systems when it comes to them seeing these wrongs being committed as it agencies, Departments, courts, doing business as The United States Of America Whether The United States Supreme Court will recognize, acknowledge, and consider the Fact that a Mandamus Action is warranted for such Exceptional and Extraordinary Circumstances as this. Paget 1) P20 Se

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-20
Waiver of right of respondents United States, et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 20, 2020)

Attorneys

Piper Lakay Ellis Snowton
Piper Lakay Ellis Snowton — Petitioner
Piper Lakay Ellis Snowton — Petitioner
United States, et al.
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent