Does the federal Court of Appeals or Eastern District Court of VA erred and had conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.2, and U.S. Constitution Amendment 14 due process in defining 'timely delivery' of a document in the district court's office?

ESTION() PRESENTED © ; . ' A Does the-federal Court of Appeals or Eastern District Court of VA erred and had conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.2, and U.S. Constitution Amendment 14 due process in defining "timely delivery" of '. a document in the district court's office? B Does the district court's/Court of Appeals punishment of "case dismissal" balanced with "untimely delivery" offence according to the U.S. Amendment 8? . a C. Does the district court erred for not providing the Plaintiffs with equal access to the court's Electronic Filing System (CM ECF), and thus violated the Plaintiffs due process and equality rights in accordance , with the U.S.? D Is the Commonwealth of VA above the Constitution or laws that has been passed and protected by Congress? , E Does the VA’ State Bar Association License Lawyers have a legal right to violate federal statutes and commit felonies to tip the scales of justice? _ Oo | Evhbry ht | Reasons for Granting the Petition , Supreme Court Rule 10(c) (c) a state court or a United States court of appeals has decided an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be settled by this Court, or has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court. State v. Dulaney, 2013-Ohio-3985 °