No. 19-7331

Lavorice Dondrell Cunningham v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: appeal appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-discretion legal-standard pending-resolution remand sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What is the appropriate standard for the determination of substantive reasonableness claim?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. What is the appropriate standard for the determination of substantive reasonableness claim? SUBSIDIARY QUESTION: Whether the Court should hold the case pending the resolution of Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, No. 18-7739, _U.S.__, 139 S.Ct 266 (June 3, 2019)(granting certiorari), and potentially grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand in light of that case? ii PARTIES Lavorice Dondrell Cunningham is the Petitioner, who was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the Respondent, who was the plaintiff-appellee below. ili

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 18, 2020)

Attorneys

Lavorice Dondrell Cunningham
Kevin Joel PageOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel PageOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent