Whether a litigant who has been repeatedly violated can come to Federal Court for protection and relief when the state courts no longer adhere to state laws

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Mr. Jones was taken to Court by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. three times. Mr. Jones, filed once in State Court against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and after Mr. Jones realized he was never going to get relief from SC State Court, Mr. Jones went to US District Court for Civil and Constitutional Rights violations under color of law or color of authority, Due process of Jaw violations, fraud upon the court and seeking protection from state court actors, and to seek redress for his grievances. The case was dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and res judicata. When a litigant has no way to get relief, and he has been repeatedly violated, can he not come to Federal Court for protection, and relief? 2. When the State Courts no longer adhere to State laws, there is nowhere else to turn to protect your rights, is it improper for the US District Courts to turn you away? 3. When Federal programs are in place to protect homeowners and borrowers, is it wrong are the federal courts exempt from hearing such cases? Many states the federal courts, especially when a party is proceeding in propria persona, get rid of the . cases as quickly as possible, Mr. Jones cannot believe that federal courts are not to . protect the citizens from the state, state actors, yet the cases always get dismissed in Federal Courts. 4. What good is it to be able to represent yourself in Court, if the Courts refuse to hear you case, and refuse to allow you to be heard? 5. Is it a violation of Mr. Jones’s Right to Due Process, or Rights under the 14% Amendment for the Courts to ignore that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has personnel manipulating HMP Applications? 6. Was it a violation of Due Process of Law, for a Master in Equity to create a Master’s Deed so that the borrower could be foreclosed upon, when the lender did not had a recorded Deed of Trust, and did not have the signature page of the Promissory Note? 7. Was Due Process of Law and Mr. Jones’s Rights violated when the Courts failed to set aside a sale under power when the property on brought between 6 and 7 % of the fair market value for the property? 8. Were Mr. Jones’s rights violated when the Court allowed the lender to fail to notice Mr. Jones of a default, of acceleration of the loan, of the sale at auction? All parties are listed on the cove page. RELATED CASES. 09/18/17: US District Court South Carolina (Greenville), Case No. 6:17-cv-02486 Jones v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et., al., 10/04/18: US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Appeal No. 18-2168, Victor Jones, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.