No. 19-734
Trina R. Patterson v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 15-usc-1692a-6 circuit-court-split debt-collector fair-debt-collection-practices-act foreclosure ninth-circuit security-interest standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration Trademark
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration Trademark
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding consistent with the opinions in Dowers v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, et al and Obduskey v. McCarthy and Holthus, LLP, et al definition of a 'debt collector' pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1692(a)(6) and in the narrow definition of 15 U.S.C. §1692f(6)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
questions presented are: 1. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding consistent with the opinions in Dowers v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, et al and Obduskey v. McCarthy and Holthus, LLP, et al , definition of a “debt collector” pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1692(a)(6) and in the narrow definition of 15 U.S.C. $1692f(6).
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-09
Waiver of right of respondent Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. to respond filed.
2019-12-31
Waiver of right of respondent Quality Loan Service Corporation to respond filed.
2019-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Quality Loan Service Corporation
Matthew B Learned — McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, Respondent
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Steven M Dailey — KUTAK ROCK LLP, Respondent
Trina R. Patterson
Trina R. Patterson — Petitioner