No. 19-7350
IFP
Tags: aedpa appeal-waiver criminal-procedure critical-stage garza-v-idaho ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement plea-bargaining post-sentencing retroactivity statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Garza v. Idaho adopts a new watershed rule of procedure that applies retroactively on state collateral review
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Garza v. Idaho, — U.S. —, 139 S.Ct. 738, 203 L.Ed.2d 77 (2019) adopts a new watershed rule of procedure that applies retroactively on state collateral review to criminal defendants that signed appeal waivers as part of a plea agreement? 2. Whether the ten (10) day hiatus after sentencing constitutes a critical stage entitling ; criminal defendants to constitutionally effective assistance of counsel for the application * to withdraw plea or perform the ministerial task of filing Form 13.5? ; ii
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 20, 2020)