Whether the United States Constitution, the United States Congress, and/or the Constitution of the State of North Carolina have jurisdiction over a Moorish-American-National under the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution

No question identified. : FEDERAL QUESTIONS 28 U.8.C.A, 81331 & 61251 1. Do the United Siates Constiiition, the United States Congress and/or the Constitution of , _ the State of North Carolina have Averoment of Jurisdiction aver a under the 13.14", and 15% Amendments to the U.S. Constitution pursuant to Subject Matter and Impersonal Jurisdiction? 2., Do the United States Constitution, United States Congress and/or the Constitution of the State of North Carolina have the right to deny the Status of a Moorish American National by forcing a questionable citizenship on him that he did not apply for and'do not want? 3. Isit an 8° Amendment violation to the U.S. Constitution under,” Cruel.and Unusual ; Punishment,” for the State of North Carolina to impose a life imprisoament on a Moorish American National that the State of North Carolina “do not? have the jerisdiction or stains over? 4. Did the United States Congress violate the U.S. Constitution under tha 3“, 14% andis* Amendments taking jurisdiction aad status that it did not have in coining the word “Black?” : making the word “Black” as an encompassment of a people (imported and enslaved) giving them 2 questionable citizenship that the 14" end 15" Amendments did not (and do not) : allow them to have as “property”, that the imported Afican Moor (created slave) did not : ask for and/or seelr, iaking personal ownership away from the southem plantation owner , and placing that ownership with the Federal and State Court system, while depriving him : (me) of his (my) Tine Nationality and Birthrights (given by bis Gay) Creator) in a cruel, unjust, and unfair social, economical, and legal system? 5. How can the word “Black, Negro, Colored” can find no former place within the nationalities of the human family aad still can be made “citizen” of any fee national and 4 constitutional government? § Asfor “Black, Negro, Colored” persons with criminal records what crimes can “property” possibly commit which it’s owner, the slave master (State & Federal Courts), is not accountable for in a court of law, when the 14" Amendment clearly establishes the former : slave as “property” under the jurisdiction of the Siate Court ofresidence andthe Federal Court system, as certified at “live birth”? Can the Court ofa Free ational Government be Found within te Court of another Gavarnmenti 2 Bdointeciar Coutts have judicial towlt From us LenSeece Pet AMIE of the us. const, ints cae? Should tre NC milla Ostrich O ristect the inderendence of the Marsh AmariZan Mati cad Vo.chauld the Me, mdlD Oierrict Ct. Sit in inddement on tre acts of the MeorisSh American Gavernmentdont wiknia the Same oc its own testi bors? : , 7 age TOT Jecisions Below The decision of the United States District Court For the middle istrict aF A.C. 1S unretorted., A CoP! \S attached as aPreundiYA to this Potions it iS Dated: Z2-3BlRolf : \oFS Juvisdtation The deciSion af the United States District flouct For the cmilhle pistrietod A ©. uad Filed an L2n3'22e/F JA. Roti of the lectsten (3 ettaChed a5 aPPeudit A to this Paetiton it 5 dated JQ3)-2el7 . Dari < diction iS Canftertted by Aericle 3.Se0.2 of the Coongtitution ter tne United SteteS14 U6 4.4 6\245 1 E+. Se4Ori Mnal lath Am endment af the Constitution far the Uncted States Coe. \hattnat (Stn Amendment and WU.S. L.A F1E51Cad oF S Lonsi LAUT LONWAL AND SIATU TORY PROUDST AWS TAVOLVED-atusa #1831 duesdicthesto etd LL AWS Case involves Amendments Vy VELL audEX and ail their Provisions are Set aut in Appendices 8,3 D-F/ We Amtud ments ate enforced bY Title I Part LCH.1d ¢ d4l Which Provides We Cons Pipacd BB pi nt ARTS 5 F242 Whe OtsvidesS Mo Ogee Waren of Pants Undat Colof al haws SiAc3 oF IBULS, CA which Provides WaX-dnareing ana Fint Sik Bound Under Sabl-Raboves Ass AbUS. CAS LIIAwhich Provides Turisdiction to F. Cts. and comensatton tam Federal Visiakors o& Federal Laws SIASI which epouvides The Surreme Ct of the U.S. Turisdre tion in AWS CASE af MA. G. LACUS V. US: L# Be S/S. And