No. 19-7353
Enamiden Celestine Okon v. Nate Knutson, Warden
IFP
Tags: brecht-standard constitutional-error due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review magwood-v-patterson procedural-default sanders-v-united-states standing successive-petition successive-petitions
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner filed 'a second or successive' application by re-raising a claim in his second habeas petition that was not fully addressed and/or adjudicated under Brecht 'substantial and injurious' effect in his first petition for constitutional error?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Petitioner filed “a second or successive” application by re-raising a claim in his second habeas petition that was not fully addressed and/or , adjudicated under Brecht “substantial and injurious” effect in his first petition for constitutional error? Okon ii .
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2019-12-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2020)