No. 19-7356

James H. Griffin v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-claim criminal-procedure downward-departure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review law-enforcement procedural-due-process sentencing sentencing-manipulation
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the lower federal courts err in denying Appellants Faasy Petrtita without affording a full and fair hearing concerning the claim that his counsel was ineffective for failing to seek a downward departure based on sentencing manipulation by law enforcement?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the lower federal courts ercar in denying Appellants Faasy Petrtita without affording a full and fair hearing conceraing the claim that his counsel Was ineffective for failing to seek a dowaward departure based 04 sentencing Manipulation by law enforcement ? , B a

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent Mark S. Inch to respond filed.
2019-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 21, 2020)

Attorneys

James H. Griffin
James H. Griffin — Petitioner
James H. Griffin — Petitioner
Mark S. Inch
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent