No. 19-7357

Chris Fordham v. Corrections Officer Manzola, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process evidence exhaustion-doctrine exhaustion-of-remedies fourth-circuit judicial-procedure procedural-dismissal section-1983 standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the USDC-EDAO erred in deciding that Plaintiff-Petitioner failed to exhaust and dismissing without prejudice Petitioner's § 1982 Complaint after Petitioner's exhausted all administrative remedies

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : oN hether dhe USDO-EDAO erred indeaiding that PlaintiffPetitioner failed te €xXhaust on d dismissing tiithoudt prej Tes die Petit itner’s 81982 Complaint oftep fee dende shhh Ls Petitioner 2 Hampted. ot remedy ted alisushetforts, a thether the Fourth GireuttCourteh = 81983 bomplaint without prejudiae for _ Sented the COA with priorexisting and tredible evfdenae that tas, unpvaifable +o present tothe Disty iat dourt and ashiah Shossed Petitioner repeatedly [attempted] 4 my

Docket Entries

2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-02-06
Waiver of right of respondents Corrections Officer Manzola, et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 21, 2020)

Attorneys

Chris Fordham
Chris Fordham — Petitioner
Chris Fordham — Petitioner
Corrections Officer Manzola, et al.
Matthew W. Sawchak — Respondent
Matthew W. Sawchak — Respondent