Joshua Neil Harrell v. Fairfield Police Department, et al.
SocialSecurity
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims
No question identified. : I. \Nos ke costs ish affain 3 ofthe bition fa ling She Nidice & Area sic, Medina Slidianets cats Ye Dae Hows ah Ea Ws 4 unhic he Teh ant Toute Rees he Its. Sebes Cinch tian! 74 Mis he ‘Trude hie ant * beats Cea ve bt Ae GY (A Mah, nd & Xt Kula Nae The w Liotta, . 3. Hos The Daher bout AedQud he Rethiner & hig Foutt ood Youtteen Ane \ elk gs a Na ihe ( deat nN he aden Wiacodinly GS age he ous ease {) Seer. Aas N {pe Feta Wace Vek. Y) GIN Touies And hduaaive, Lee. /\ GIN Touts, LLC. ‘ | | H Wes And Ar \\e 2) a) “e abe hide Ns . te een ee S, NN Ke Yay Ke (uituay, GM Touts And te da Bf Yous Ue. x nh Ye Wo Dla 4 dyedton \ Kn \ Bondoc ond . asta ath Ree ASS . [ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. oJ ah al partice tthe peeling naka buon of thease on the cover citveet ot this. L CWee cl fine the He Det | 7. GIN toed \bottatee, Tae. GH Touing, Lhe | 3, fats Shed, fon Hud AG el GM Toole LEC) A Cus Neldete, oustal dH Towits Ad heft lie./{ GM NY Ice ) 1. Sehr Mel Lee i. CM Towits Me Aduntive Tre. -—Stlga Cts Suveter Cat dh. KOMI? | A. Aa Wal Hoel a Fath Bh De, in : | hited Stes Dental Each bs. \ (clit I, 115 -cuO05 AE A 2 Mw Wiel y EG Be Deel, Wb es Cart ad, er The Uli Cha Mh, 19-4677