Whether the jury relied on an invalid conviction for distributing Ultram in finding the defendant guilty of money laundering

ESTIONS PRESENTED J WHEN A JURY FOUND SINGLETON GUILTY OF COUNT 10 OF THE IMDICTMENT, WHICH ALLEGED THAT HE DISTRIBUTED “ULTRAM”; HOW CAN IT BE DETERMINED THAT THE JURY DID NOT RELY ON “ULTRAM? IN FINDING HIM GUILTY, OF MONEY LAUNDERING THE PROCEEDS FROM DISTRIBUITING ULTRAM, OXYCODONE, AND . DIAZEPAM WHEN A GENERAL VERDICT FORM WAS USED? AFTER TRIAL, ULTRAM WAS DETERMINED NOT TO BE ON THE FEDERAL DRUG SCHEDULES AND THEREFORE NOT A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL CODES. : mgt DID THE GOVERNMENT VIOLATE BRADY V. MARYLAND WHEN THEY REFUSED TO RELEASE 34 CL DEBRIEFING VIDEOS, WHICH WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED SINGLETON’S THOERY OF DEFENSE, E., THAT HE WAS OPERATING A LEGITIMATE MEDICAL PAIN CLINIC? Til 1 DID THE PETITIONER RECEIVE INEFFECTIVE . ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, WHEN COUNSEL FAILED TO OBTAIN COPIES OF THE COMPUTER HARD-DRIVES, . WHICH CONTAINED SURVEILLANCE FOOTAGE THAT WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED SINGLETON’S THEORY OF DEFENSE AND DISPROVED THE GOVERNMENT’S THEORY OF PROSECUTION? . -ii;