No. 19-7377
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment appeal appellate-counsel conflict-of-interest criminal-procedure due-process evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-argument procedural-error right-to-counsel trial-counsel weight-of-evidence
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the appellate attorney ineffective assistance of counsel?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. WAS THE APPELLATE ATTORNEY DAVID R. JUERGENS INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR NOT RAISING ANY LEGAL ARGUMENT AGAINST THE WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE? : 2. WAS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR NOT REQUESTING AN ARRESTING OFFICER AT TRIAL? 3. WAS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR NOT REQUESTING EVERY MOTION, HEARING, OR JUDICIAL PROCEEDING TO BE CONDUCTED OVER FROM THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST REPRESENTATION?
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2019-08-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2020)
Attorneys
New York
Daniel Gross — Monroe County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Daniel Gross — Monroe County District Attorney's Office, Respondent