No. 19-738

Tom Domingo, Sr. v. Department of the Army, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-12-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts jurisdiction kloeckner-v-solis mixed-cases obstruction-of-justice reduction-in-force standing supreme-court-ruling veterans-preference
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Latest Conference: 2020-01-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the US. Court of Appeals obstruct justice by ignoring or usurping the U.S. Supreme Court ruling of Kloeckner v. Solis Secretary of Labor federal courts hearing mixed cases

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED \ 1) Did the US. Court of Appeals obstruct justice \ by ignoring or usurping the U.S. Supreme Court ruling of Kloeckner v. Solis Secretary of Labor federal courts 1 hearing mixed cases. ; 2) Is the US. District Court exempt from using the Paper Reduction Act (PRA) by following federal rules of procedure by ordering that the U.S. agency or department get three certified copies of the case being appealed to district court even after agency sends email stating they do not need a copy thus complying with the PRA. 3) Does the U.S. District Court have jurisdiction to hear mixed cases of age discrimination and veteran’s preference for Vietnam and Vietnam Era veterans the VRA. 4) Did the federal government have the right to have a Reduction in Force (RIF) and fire the plaintiff who was part of the Flight Service Air Traffic Control‘lers who were fired in 2005 and not use veterans preference. 5) Since both courts district and appeals courts obstructed justice by not following the ruling of the Kloeckner v. Solis case from the supreme court the filing fees should be returned. ii !

Docket Entries

2020-01-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.
2019-12-23
Waiver of right of respondent Department of the Army, et al. to respond filed.
2019-10-07
Motion (19M21) for leave to proceed as a veteran Denied.
2019-07-17
MOTION (19M21) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-25
Motion (19M21) for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
2019-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 9, 2020)
2019-05-16
Application (18A1177) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 15, 2019.
2019-05-03
Application (18A1177) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 16, 2019 to August 15, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Department of the Army, et al.
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Tom Domingo
Tom Domingo Sr. — Petitioner
Tom Domingo Sr. — Petitioner