No. 19-7381
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: article-iii constitutional-interpretation constitutional-provisions-involved due-process equal-protection executive-authority executive-delegation judicial-review separation-of-powers standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the appellate court's determination that the government has the final say on whether petitioner had the right to pursue his late-filed appeal is unconstitutional because it unlawfully delegates to the Executive a decision that should be made by the Judiciary
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the appellate court’s determination that the government has the final say on whether petitioner had the right to pursue his late-filed appeal is unconstitutional because it unlawfully delegates to the Executive a decision that should be made by the Judiciary. i
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2020)
Attorneys
Percy Jones
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent