No. 19-7385
IFP
Tags: anders-brief appellate-procedure appellate-review constitutional-law constitutional-requirement criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance judicial-procedure pro-se pro-se-claims right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When an Appellant files an Appellate Brief raising Pro Se claims after appointed counsel submits an Anders Brief, is the reviewing appellate court constitutionally required to address the Pro Se claims and provide the basic reasons for the court's decision to deny relief?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : When an Appellant files an Appellate Brief raising Pro Se claims after appointed counsel submits an Anders Brief, is the reviewing appellate court constitutionally required to address the Pro Se claims and provide the basic reasons for the court's decision to deny relief?
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-01-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2020)