Whether a defendant must point to an actual state court prosecution to demonstrate a prior conviction is not a categorical match

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether a defendant who seeks to demonstrate that a prior conviction is not a categorical match for federal sentencing purposes must point to an actual state court prosecution illustrating the state crime’s overbreadth. 2. Whether a defendant’s conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), felon in possession of a firearm, must be reversed for insufficient evidence because there was no proof that he knew at the time of the offense that he had a prior felony conviction, as required by Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019). i INTERESTED PARTIES All parties to the case below are named in the caption. y il RULE 14.1(b)Gii) STATEMENT There are no proceedings directly related to the case in this Court. iil