Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW QUESTION #1 a Here in these United States of America where we have all ¥ pledged "...justice for all", is this Honorable High Court's supervisory authority called for when state courts deviate from reality and our rule of law to the point of disingenuously misapplying, misinterpreting, and outrightly disregarding unambiguous statutory requirements along with constitutional : mandates for due process, equal protection, and separation of powers to arbitrarily reconstruct and enhance statutorily and constitutionally sound individualized life with parole sentences into one-size-fits-—all life without parole sentences by legislating from the bench with incredible result-oriented decisions? QUESTION #2 Is a mandatory sentence to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole constitutional or unconstitutional? i : PARTIES : TO THIS PROCEEDING a . Khadija T. Diggs, Assistant Counsel 7 : Office of the Chief Counsel , Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Respondent . 1101 South Front Street, Suite 5100 Harrisburg, PA 17104 Attorney. General of Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General : 16th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 ¥ Bert Hudson, #AP-1969 Pro se Petitioner SCI Greene 175 Progress Drive Waynesburg, PA 15370 ii