No. 19-7400

Christopher R. Glenn v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights counsel-misconduct criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing fraud habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-misconduct judicial-proceedings pro-se-petition standing supervisory-power
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Eleventh Circuit so far depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power when it sanctioned the Southern District of Florida's finding that Glenn's claims, well pled from personal knowledge, that his counsel had rendered ineffective assistance by defrauding him, misleading him, and, tendering a false document to the Court, could be dismissed without either response, or, an evidentiary hearing?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED oe , Question #1: Did the Eleventh Circuit so far depart from the accepted : and usual course of judicial proceedings as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory ‘power when it sanctioned the Southern District of Florida's finding that Glenn's : : claims, well pled from personal knowledge, that his counsel had rendered ineffective assistance by defrauding him, misleading him, and, tendering a false document to the Court, : could be dismissed without either response, or, an, evident; jary hearing? . ; -i: ,

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2020)

Attorneys

Christopher R. Glenn
Christopher Glenn — Petitioner
Christopher Glenn — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent