Whether a criminal judgment obtained through violations of state and federal constitutions and laws by law enforcement and prosecution qualifies for habeas corpus challenge

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED se Oo * % CAPITAL CASE * * 1. Judgment based upon criminal violations of State and United States . Constitutions and Laws, by Law Enforcement, Prosecution; Qualify for Habeas Corpus challenge to illegal judgment as a matter of law, by U.S. Constitutionally Guaranteed Right pursuant to (U.S. Const. Art. I. §9 ¢1.2, and. . U.S. Const. Amend. XIV). / 2. State of California Violates United States Constitutional Laws by “suspension'' of Habeas Challenge based upon Prosecution's criminal acts to obtain judgments. State of California refuses to ‘‘appoint counsel" in Capital Cases pursuant to (28 U.S.C. §2261(a)(b)(c)(d)), in a Filed Habeas Writ before the Court presented with evidence of criminal violations by State of California Executive Branch, and Bars all Self-Represen: tation, and refuses to allow any discovery. 3. The Crimes presented to the State and United States Courts pursuant to United States Criminal Statute (Title 18 US C. §04), a Statutory Demand ; : on U.S. Citizens. The U.S. Coucts issued a demand for State Exhaustion pcioc to U.S. Coucts accepting jucisdiction, alledging ‘No Legal precedent", this to include (28 U.S.C. §2241(c)(3)); (§2254(a), '§2264(a)(1) ,$1651, 1652; 28 U.S.C. §2254(a) “only” on grounds pursuant to judgment of a State Court, . “only on grounds that He is in custody in violation of Constitution, Laws ‘or Treaties of the United States. : 4. The Duties of Our U.S. and State Judges pursuant to duties incumbant upon Oath to obtain vested authority to duties owed to U.S. Constitution, Laws and Authoritative Answer in Law. Also the legal clarification of suspension of Writ of Habeas Corpus to challenge judgments based upon criminal violations of law, by those vested with authority by State and United States Constitutions, Statutory Laws. "'No Rebellion or Threat to Public Safety". ; ; . .