Whether the United States District Court erred in dismissing a pro se habeas corpus petition due to the lack of jurisdiction because the habeas per petitioner's state habeas proceedings were still ongoing before the state habeas court

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED — Qucsteas/Tasus Molt Ds the Auctamast a€ the Ups took Gletes Destn'ck Court la aseyissg, a Po hom ar Factarck habeas FAUCE Vetel ab Tes Clue te Lack of qanach eheas baceusa he habias par peanc’s Stete habaad Procesrafies, Ove Still eonclese befare the Stete habeas coud! Quest SX/Lssur Ao. 2! Drel Lhe Uasltect Skates Digtneh — Cour Cammit arsenrer BAS Leus whoa it aracteck Ah ; Reaspovela nts Motu fac Summery AGebea mest Upas a Matene Pact (saad cbs pate. Aveshas/Zséuu Als, 3. Diehl Lhe Ulsiteal Ste kx DiStneb Coeur Cemmit Ae acrer 18 Lous whas if Accorciaat Er presam# hem ef gestactoess Lo Ee Gtete eeu as lagal Pomclusion Let Ea Pebhner Ld wot ela pnoret ef WS Conshbubonetl mekhe te ep Clee hor VSstrtavce 6F easel 2 Queshan/Fssuc Ase. 4! Ds ee Camusct Dale sachet elepnuced el hts oe hac Gans b'tahenet rights +s Dae Proc ay richer CHL LATH Amaecelmat tes Ela Unitech Sbhtr Cort’ him Auch appellete TRUS Wheas @ Gorm Appocts Fills ta aclatcest thea Sone Ge (Ssue Oresasstect Cac a cot hia & aapecte bi Ken? Auestrers/E£ssuc Ae.S* DS a Erimusetl Delenclest chopnuret 0 his Comahtubemel NGhts te 2Olae hur sci ster al @ounmack Usetel Lhe ETH Amenekmand tS EL Ubsidecd Gte tes Caersttorbom wher Rak cCouwaclhs CLA te Covsaluct AN EXele ernal gash INVERHQa HA Of Ee Coote of ELL Cede ; fects t& treue aim Lo Mmmevel o€ EU Poets o@ che Gostr as wcll C&A Govecaces laus 5 ered Petits ke acl cate himazlG ay ts EMRE Meekeck [Cass tocolucd arch aguicer Gs Qupak Usieaseay te heat Rha Sletedk Vx fo Usreasesyrig . i