No. 19-742
James Bailey-Snyder v. United States
Amici (3)Response Waived
Tags: arrest-definition civil-rights criminal-investigation criminal-procedure due-process liberty-restriction prisoner-rights prosecutorial-discretion solitary-confinement speedy-trial wilkinson-v-austin
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does imposing solitary confinement on a prisoner while police and prosecutors investigate and consider new criminal charges amount to an "arrest" giving rise to speedy trial protections?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does imposing solitary confinement on a prisoner while police and prosecutors investigate and consider new criminal charges amount to an 'arrest' giving rise to speedy trial protections?
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
Brief amicus curiae of Former Corrections Directors filed. (Received Jan. 13)
2020-01-08
Brief amici curiae of Professors and Practitioners of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Medicine filed. (Distributed)
2020-01-07
Brief amici curiae of Human Rights Clinics, Law Professors and Non-Profit Organizations filed. (Distributed)
2019-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-12-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 10, 2020)
2019-09-26
Application (19A344) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 7, 2019.
2019-09-25
Application (19A344) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 8, 2019 to December 7, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Former Corrections Directors
Human Rights Clinics, Law Professors and Non-Profit Organizations
James Bailey-Snyder
Daniel M. Greenfield — MacArthur Justice Center, Petitioner
Professors and Practitioners of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Medicine
Jeffrey T. Green — Sidley Austin, Amicus
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent