No. 19-7440
Alan Strattan v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Tags: 28-U.S.C-2253 28-usc-2253 basis-for-denying-relief certificate-of-appealability circuit-court district-court habeas habeas-corpus jurists-of-reason merits-of-claims standard-of-review
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment
HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a petitioner seeking the issuance of a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 is required to demonstrate that jurists of reason would find the merits of his claims debatable, or, instead, to demonstrate only that jurists of reason would find the basis for denying relief itself debatable?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a petitioner seeking the issuance of a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 is required to demonstrate that jurists of reason would find the merits of his claims debatable, or, instead, to demonstrate only that jurists of reason would find the basis for denying relief itself debatable? , i
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida to respond filed.
2020-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 26, 2020)
Attorneys
Alan Strattan
Dane Kristofor Chase — Chase Law Florida P.A., Petitioner
Dane Kristofor Chase — Chase Law Florida P.A., Petitioner
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida