No. 19-7449

Jack Robert Smith v. Harry Oreol

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-rights civil-rights-mental-health-commitment-due-process- constitutional-challenge due-process equal-protection involuntary-commitment involuntary-hospitalization mental-health mental-health-commitment patient-rights supreme-court-review
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the involuntary civil commitment of a non-dangerous individual violates due process and the Eighth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : — Cevtent— RUCSHONS PRESEMED -Zpls cywoment ot tHe Case — pes BEASO LS spe GEANTIVNE que Wet -2Z7 blo E ExplayAtiov of SHE pprer Vi dplid _inpes Peeters Ste Hospital Peper q-25-201F —37ts PR. SANA Spurals Peport ¥-A-20\7_ Spes De. Pista DHNS0VS Peporr 5-22-20\4 _ pes Lovewp Proernn Explanation van peport of Petals FV MB eulnes Spds, Us DIET povier WRIFof Haas LorpuA gH-20VT — Spls Dist (ever Morton , Pes fonse 0 orp Stow LAs 2-21-Z26l¢ 2% pes Super (over +e pUsennyts 27-2015 —APls [ppeaevypum Suppor (ouvert |O262 ype litAHon gy-b6~-2618 3 pls OH die -perrhon Fen Perlepeint, Cyennts W-W-Z01e Ao phtes tote , f Iet2 Quests Peesentep 1, iS OLONVOR VDonaloson, 422 US. eri] a Valin leenl Ppt de Der 2 a $63 (475) z. 1s Fouenn y, LovisiAuw, S04 US, TI 77| 1780 (1992) still Vali? 17-14, NG SC 2 ft te Auswee Is yes fe tele, ABOVE Questions aHen wHy Po THe [owER Courts 3 THe CaAlt PC, secton) joZ2G Pefuse fo ABIDE BY qHese |MportAnt US, SUpReME Abvet DECISIONS e A, 1s te arb. 1026 athte VRevE AS weiter) i) ANY WAY, Uke, optioval Out pAtEnr 4picntment, A POcteR PECMWAMD ING crepitnr pelerse of k prtient ete. an 5. ih tle Auswer is yes fo FL 2 oP #2, ten Is tle Win wDh-toPy Outpatient” Conecp PPObPh™ PEQuirEemenT iw tHe CA Ld, 1026 Law, & yiolAtio) ofTHE Supremrey GJnuse Arnele Vi Clinuse 2 7 tL. ib tHe AUswer Is: yes T funy of tHe Above, | yen is Nor Feveer| preemption papper for ¢ F. Is it Vor Uvtouseeotionel to Leep PY NGI Acquitee _Hespitilizeb WHEY pHEey Are Not menvenlly ill? SZ, 1s w Nor Uutouserlotounl to Keep Pr Vel pegutec Hospitli2-ep 2 on Forte THEM +o £0 -fo Out PONENT wen fHey ARE MOT fp paneer to THEMSENES DR. OTHERS & CApRBIE ot HuUNe BY THEMsEelvEs or with tHe AIP of PEspous (Ble finaly or-FRIGAPS(C g, Is i+ Nor crvel 3 vNUsuAl PULISH MEE & OR ‘ Viaaiei qo keep AU Wel ACqUIHEE cournavaliy, HospithZLEp AFTE Pili FIED A -Pclense PELOMMEPAHON | Lo _ Questions TRESEMED 101 For bl ple aitizeus ivreertl syle 1 cupRtme Covet PIEASE alneify tHe EXACT Leen BASIS FOP Covtin VED Hosp HilZeHon e 1, will THE U5. supreme touPt PleAs© lnesty He CLRCT tetnl BASIS FOR SteHIGHTpelense peloeDWL TO sever LA ? IZ, is THERO Avy Overlober dost Hut onal pug pe necss Vielarous Why CRs f 13, will te Ur suppeMme, LoueT pIEASE ppper Mf stealeHt pelErse, SINLE Dk. SHLHAL HAS PELDMMELDED FHls SIVLED Zols? | , | jit partll tHE US: supreme Coupe pleAse Use my CASG 10 SET P yew) Lecal Peetepe— x ually put A CAP 1 HE NH DNWwIbe putonsteutonnd fosprtlzArion Peorlem ° Is, ts iplifoenia oF ANY OTHER stHtt, suDLe , CoRpoR tion oF peesou, ABOVE | —+HE WS: fpnetitution OF US» SUPLEME puget DELUSIONS a | 2of2_

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-19
Waiver of right of respondent Harry Oreol to respond filed.
2020-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Harry Oreol
Kenneth Charles ByrneCalifornia Attorney General, Respondent
Kenneth Charles ByrneCalifornia Attorney General, Respondent
Jack Robert Smith
Jack R. Smith — Petitioner
Jack R. Smith — Petitioner