No. 19-7451
David Keith Rogers v. California
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment constitutional-hearing constitutional-rights court-discretion discretion due-process evidentiary-hearing fair-trial hearing judicial-procedure juror-misconduct legal-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a court is presented with admissions of clear juror misconduct is it constitutionally compelled to conduct a hearing to determine the extent and effect of that misconduct or, as the California Supreme Court holds, does it have discretion to refuse to conduct such a hearing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented For Review When a court is presented with admissions of clear juror misconduct is it constitutionally compelled to conduct a hearing to determine the extent and effect of that misconduct or, as the California Supreme Court holds, does it have discretion to refuse to conduct such a hearing?
Docket Entries
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-22
Reply of petitioner David Rogers filed. (Distributed)
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-01
Brief of respondent State of California in opposition filed.
2020-03-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 1, 2020.
2020-03-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 1, 2020 to May 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2020.
2020-02-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 2, 2020 to April 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 2, 2020)
2019-12-18
Application (19A682) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 3, 2020.
2019-12-08
Application (19A682) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 24, 2019 to February 3, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
State of California
Kenneth N. Sokoler — California Department of Justice, Respondent
Kenneth N. Sokoler — California Department of Justice, Respondent