I. In Aid of its Appellate Jurisdiction, this Hon. Court is empowered to Compel the District Court to decide excessively delayed cases.

II. Appellate Review has been futile; on-going discriminatory conduct from Courts in the State of California-refuse to follow regulation or case law; thus, maintaining the Corp. fiction for personal reason(s).

III. On-going Prejudice from the Central District Court-refuses to recognize advances of the Corporate structure; therefore, it erred; engaging in-Reversible error.

IV. The Office of the Clerk at the U.S. Supreme Court-discriminated; did not follow regulation 28 U.S.C. § 2111; Infringing Petitioner Rights- denying its Writ of Certiorari on harmless Error-immaterial principle

V. The Office of the clerk-failed to follow regulation; not docketing petitioner-timely emergency application to Stay the courts Mandate

Whether the district court erred in excessively delaying the case, engaging in discriminatory conduct, and refusing to recognize the corporate structure