No. 19-7467
Frankie Beqiraj v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defendant-presence due-process jury-selection peremptory-challenges right-to-be-present waiver
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant has a constitutional right to be present during a conference at which the parties exercise their peremptory challenges to strike prospective jurors
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a defendant has a constitutional right to be present during a conference at which the parties exercise their peremptory challenges to strike prospective jurors. 2. Whether a waiver of a defendant’s right to be present during the exercise of peremptory challenges can be found merely from his failure to protest, . When it was not clear he knew the purpose of the in-chamber’s conference and the record does not reflect any opportunity to consult with counsel about which jurors to strike. i
Docket Entries
2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-02-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2020)
Attorneys
Frankie Beqiraj
Beverly Van Ness — Law Office of Beverly Van Ness, Petitioner
Beverly Van Ness — Law Office of Beverly Van Ness, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent