Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the standard for materiality in a mail fraud case is determined by the likely behavior of the recipient of the alleged misrepresentations
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. This case raises questions concerning the standard by materiality in a mail fraud case is to be determined. The United States Supreme Court in Univ. Health Serv. Inc. v. United States ex.re. Escobar, 136 S. Ct. 1989, 2003-2004, has made it clear that materiality may be determined by evidence of the “likely behavior of the recipient of the alleged Escobar, 136 S. Ct. at 2002. Conversely, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in this case and in United States v. Lindsey, 805 F.3d 1009 (98 Cir. 2017 that evidence of specific lender conduct or behavior is inadmissible to establish materiality.
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-11
Reply of Olga Palamarchuk filed.
2020-05-01
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-04-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 1, 2020.
2020-04-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 29, 2020 to May 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-03-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 29, 2020.
2020-03-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 30, 2020 to April 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 30, 2020.
2020-02-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 28, 2020 to March 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2020)