Barbara E. Brown v. San Bernardino County, California, et al.
Securities
Whether the Te iscait Judges erred in the dissmissol of His pettion, ih @greeance with District Court Sudje Cony!
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the Te iscait Judges erred in the dissmissol of His pettion, ih @greeance with District Court Sudje Cony! 2, Whether This petition ‘8, Was or should. be Consi'de off Frivlous. under /au/ ft ender He Kico he /6U.5.C.196[ is J, heer Dstt Curt Judge Cormac Carney erred in denying PetHoner He paght > Nedpess 1 heey Safe Cay obstructed justice by de wig Ss WleHes Jude Cantey abused bys power in +405 Z and (3) three previous acti is by denying petdeenep He First Améatlnent higlt 1 pedpss sikee 20/3? CG. Whether Jute Caney aided and abetted pefihioness deterdarts in this end previous, ach ons Sought agains big Bea; L ake (A Lai! Lntorcemey? aticers which includes, but Jimited fo, precticity feud HMegal senc trons agaist fektinep misappropriations OF funds glloceted b Congress far oppoiktment of Coumse/ far ThOse ‘Cus in the disadvantaged” Class of, Anricans C 1, whether refarctions shoul] be pri, fo ek slaves # , a @