Douglas Edwin Ball, Jr. v. Michigan
Arbitration
Whether the Fourteenth Amendment was violated because it is impossible to determine whether the verdict was unanimous where there is insufficient evidence to support the conviction
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . . . ; Tferereover's Dive Feocess eréuTs vwbee THe JueTeenTH ; Aneupmenr WEee vrolkteD Because fr Fs Tupossrere To Determrwe WHETHER THE vERoTcr was UNANT Movs WHERE ; There Ts ENsvFFECLEwT Evidence Te Suppotr THE ConvicTDw . ; Foz ToeTvee Awd The Terac Cover Altewep THE Juey To etven A VEeDIcer oF Gurity To Faesr Degree “uenee FF THer Fouwo Exttee. Feemeortaren muener oR FEtony Muedee. I Tae Texac Covet Eeieo In Admtrrrwe DWA Evedence fowd : OW Steers Worn BY VFerermuge THe DaAy THE VECtem WENT Missing WHeee THe “FRosecvTIneg ATToRNEt CAanr ESTABLTSH A CHAEw oF Custepy ce LAY A FouwbaTmen Thar wevid | Asuee The Cover THAT wo Chess ContAnAT ren ClCveneD Ano Apm©ssZow oF THE Evipewce wAs Not HARMLEss Eezor. ; it oo .