No. 19-7475

Douglas Edwin Ball, Jr. v. Michigan

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2020-01-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment appeal civil-rights conviction dna-evidence due-process evidence insufficient-evidence jury jury-instructions unanimous-verdict
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Latest Conference: 2020-03-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment was violated because it is impossible to determine whether the verdict was unanimous where there is insufficient evidence to support the conviction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . . . ; Tferereover's Dive Feocess eréuTs vwbee THe JueTeenTH ; Aneupmenr WEee vrolkteD Because fr Fs Tupossrere To Determrwe WHETHER THE vERoTcr was UNANT Movs WHERE ; There Ts ENsvFFECLEwT Evidence Te Suppotr THE ConvicTDw . ; Foz ToeTvee Awd The Terac Cover Altewep THE Juey To etven A VEeDIcer oF Gurity To Faesr Degree “uenee FF THer Fouwo Exttee. Feemeortaren muener oR FEtony Muedee. I Tae Texac Covet Eeieo In Admtrrrwe DWA Evedence fowd : OW Steers Worn BY VFerermuge THe DaAy THE VECtem WENT Missing WHeee THe “FRosecvTIneg ATToRNEt CAanr ESTABLTSH A CHAEw oF Custepy ce LAY A FouwbaTmen Thar wevid | Asuee The Cover THAT wo Chess ContAnAT ren ClCveneD Ano Apm©ssZow oF THE Evipewce wAs Not HARMLEss Eezor. ; it oo .

Docket Entries

2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Douglas E. Ball, Jr.
Douglas Edwin Ball Jr. — Petitioner
Douglas Edwin Ball Jr. — Petitioner