Whether the Circumstances regarding the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule § 2010F not evolved around the obtaining, holding and exclusion of evidence in the Criminal Conviction Case v. BA-HIS-HAT, consist of the future empirical evidence and/or data that is required to undermine the Court's assumptions made in Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340 (1987) and United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), in order to revise the U.S. Supreme Court's conclusions accordingly

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED oe 4) Whether he Circumstances regarding “he Fourth Amendment Evelusionary Rule § 2OI0F not 5 fevolved atoulnd Me eblaining , ol ding onc exclusion of eviclence in the Criminal) Conviction Case ¥ BA-HISHAT, Consist OF the Future empirical evidance and or doten that 1s veg wired yo Unclenm ) ne, Are Cour tys aSSuM+Pions mode, wn LU rors NV. Kru 4 Ze) LLS., 353-354 14 91) 1 ancl. Lunitecl States V. Leon . 468 Us at VIEW. Yat Q@21~9ayv bas] . \norcdlen Yo revise the U.S. Supreme Counts Conclusian s occordshaly?