Where counsel lies about the existence of psychiatric-mitigating-evidence,due-process,ineffective-assistance-of-counsel,habeas-corpus,constitutional-rights,criminal-procedure

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Where counsel lies about the existence of psychiatric mitigating evidence and denies the accused the Use of 16 U.S.C. SSooteA(ed in United States v. Fessel, does this constitute & substantial shawing of the denial of a Constitutional right far COA purpases ? TF a petitioner lacks the factual predicate to file Under 98 U.3.C. § Ad4A(A)(1A) and the one-year period expires: 13 he time-barred from filing under (D)? How does the LS. Marshal Hold (Exhibit 4) not eonstitute an Unconstitutional State action under AA(ANB) shen (1) the action thereat hindered access to the courts, and (4) denied “equal pratection of the laws?” When an unconstitutional State action triqgers BAA (AAD: does @ petitioner still need to shows the “actranrdinary Circumstances” of Holland v. Florida 6r the external interference in Coleman v. Thompson f Onee Activated, iS there & time limit as to how long daAN(4)(1)(8) can last? Is theve any ruling or statute that prohibits a haloeas petitioner Fram starting under Jad (NA), Octwating (Di triggering (8) and then removing (®) by reactWating (D\? Could the Court clart fy the “reasonable diligence” in Yolland in relation to this case? \